• Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Skip navigation

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Global Energy Law & Regulation Portal

Join OGELFORUM

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Global Energy Law & Regulation Portal

  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • Sign in
  • About About
    1. Home
    2. About
    3. About OGEL
    4. About OGEL
    5. Founding Editor T.W. Wälde
    6. T.W. Wälde
    7. Editorial team
    8. Editorial team
    9. Contributing Authors
    10. Contributing Authors
    11. Subscriptions
    12. Subscriptions
  • Journal Journal
    1. Home
    2. Journal
    3. Browse Issues
    4. Browse
    5. Articles by Category
    6. By Category
    7. Articles by Author
    8. By Author
    9. Advance publication
    10. Advance publication
    11. Specials
    12. Specials
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Book reviews
    16. Reviews
  • Legal & Regulatory docs. L & R docs
    1. Home
    2. Legal & Regulatory docs.
    3. L&R by Country
    4. L&R by Country
    5. L&R by Category
    6. L&R by Category
    7. L&R recent additions
    8. L&R recent additions
    9. Search
    10. Search
  • OGELFORUM OGELFORUM
    1. Home
    2. OGELFORUM
    3. About OGELFORUM
    4. About OGELFORUM
    5. Browse archive
    6. Browse by date / topic
    7. Search
    8. Search
    9. Join
    10. Join
  • News & Events Events
    1. Home
    2. News & Events
    3. News
    4. News
    5. Events
    6. Events
  • OGEL Studies OGEL Studies
    1. Home
    2. OGEL Studies
    3. About OGEL Studies
    4. About OGEL Studies
  • Subscribe
Home > Legal & Regulatory docs.

Blusun SA Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v Italy - ICSID Case No. ARB/14/3 - Decision on Annulment - 13 April 2020

  • Sign in to download document
Country
  • Belgium
  • France
  • Germany
  • Italy
Year

2020

Summary

..

II. INTRODUCTION

3. This case concerns an application for annulment by the Claimants ("Application for Annulment") for the alleged dismissal of claims on their merits pronounced by the Award dispatched to the Parties on December 27, 2016 (the "Award").

4. The Award related to a dispute submitted to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID") on the basis of the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty (the "ECT"), as well as the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and nationals of other States (the "ICSID Convention").

5. The Claimants argued that the Tribunal which rendered the Award (the "Tribunal"), decided that it had jurisdiction over the claims brought by the Claimants against the Italian Republic, dismissed those claims on merits, and in doing so, the Tribunal inexplicably failed to consider the measure at the heart of one of those claims and on which the other claims relied in important respects.

6. Central to each claim advanced by the Claimants lies certain investments made concerning a solar energy project in the Puglia region of Italy: a 120-megawatt project, where plants were to be connected with each other by a medium-voltage grid, with electricity sub- stations constructed to connect that grid to the high-voltage grid. The project consisted of uniting approximately 120 individual solar plants of one megawatt each. 114 of the 120 plants were to be built in the municipality of Brindisi and the remaining six in the municipality of Mesagne. The project also required the construction of a network of underground cables spread over 370 kilometers. These cables formed two rings connecting the solar plants to each other, and to two substations. The Claimants acquired the shares of 12 local development companies which hold all of the relevant rights and permits for the plants via Eskosol S.R.L ("Eskosol"), an Italian company owned and controlled by Blusun (the "Project" or "Puglia project").

7. The dispute in the underlying arbitration related to certain regulatory and judicial measures adopted by the Italian Government, which in the Claimants' view frustrated their investments in the Puglia project.

8. The Claimants advanced three distinct legal claims in the original arbitration proceedings: (a) the first claim was for an alleged breach of Article 10(1), first sentence, of the ECT: such claim was advanced on the basis that in the Claimants' view, the Italian Government failed to encourage and create stable, equitable, favorable, and transparent conditions for the Claimants' Investments in the Puglia project (the "Legal Instability Claim"); (b) the second claim was for an alleged breach of Article 10(1), second sentence, of the ECT: this claim was advanced on the basis that in the Claimants' view, Italy failed to accord fair and equitable treatment to their investments, namely regarding certain legitimate expectations (the "Legitimate Expectations Claim"); and (c) the third claim was advanced on the basis that in the Claimants' view the regulatory measures and judicial decisions adopted by the Italian Constitutional Court, the Italian Government and the Commune had an effect equivalent to nationalization or expropriation within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the ECT (the "Expropriation Claim").

9. The Claimants seek annulment of the entirety of the Award's alleged dismissal of the Claims on their Merits, on the basis of Article 52(1) (b), (d) and (e) of the ICSID Convention. Such grounds of Article 52(1) of the ICSID Convention respectively state as follows: (i) the Tribunal manifestly exceeded its powers; (ii) the Tribunal seriously departed from a fundamental rule of procedure; and (iii) that the Award has failed to state the reasons on which it is based.

10. The Application for Annulment submitted by the Claimants mainly rests on the foregoing legal grounds. Each one of the legal grounds of Article 52(1) of the ICSID Convention, in the present Annulment proceedings, has the exact same factual basis.[1] These are the alleged dismissal of the Tribunal by not considering and addressing the DIA Certificates of Conformity issued by the Municipality of Brindisi, while adjudicating the Legitimate Expectation claim. This is precisely the omission addressed by the Claimants in their Application for Annulment and it is central to the second claim brought by the Claimants in the original arbitration proceedings, their Legitimate Expectations Claim. 2 This, according to Claimants, breaches Article 52(1) (b) (d) and (e) of the ICSID Convention. The Committee will, therefore, examine these grounds.

...

X. DECISION

339. For the reasons stated supra, the ad hoc Committee decides as follows:

(i) Blusun S.A, Jean Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein's Request for Annulment is denied.

(ii) It is not necessary to rule on the request of Italy for immediate termination of the proceedings considering the decision of this Committee in subparagraph (i) abovementioned.

(iii) The Claimants shall bear the costs, fees and expenses of these proceedings, i.e. those incurred by the Respondent, ICSID and members of this ad hoc Committee.

[1] Memorial on Annulment, para. 100.

Award

  • On OGEL: Blusun S.A., Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v Italy - ICSID Case No. ARB/14/3 - Award - 27 December 2016
  • On TDM: Blusun S.A., Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v Italy - ICSID Case No. ARB/14/3 - Award - 27 December 2016

To download this document you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!

If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here

Call for contributions

OGEL Call for Papers: COVID-19 and the Energy Transition

Dr. Theophilus Acheampong and Professor Tina Soliman Hunter

  • Dr. Theophilus Acheampong
  • Prof. Tina Hunter

OGEL Call for Papers: Law and Policy for Gas Flaring in a Low-carbon Economy

Dr. Tade Oyewunmi and Mohamed Rali Badissy

  • Dr. Tade Oyewunmi
  • Mohamed Rali Badissy

OGEL Call for Papers: The Circular Economy and the Energy Transition

Dr. Maria R. Mazzanti and Giacomo Luciani

OGEL Call for Papers

OGEL Call for Papers: Review of the Energy Sector in Ghana

OGEL Editorial Team

OGEL
  • More
  • Contribute

Advance publication

The Political Settlement and Decision making in Ghana's Energy Sector

20 Apr 2021

I. Ackah, J.B. Dramani, R.K. Asiama

  • I. Ackah
  • J.B. Dramani
  • R.K. Asiama

Direct Challenges Against EU Acts and Standing Requirements for Private Persons - Order of the General Court on 20 May 2020 in Case T 526/19, Nord Stream 2 v Parliament and Council

14 Apr 2021

K. Talus

  • K. Talus

Moving the Goalpost? Policy and Regulatory Issues Concerning Ghana's Renewable Energy Integration Targets

9 Apr 2021

N.A. Obeng-Darko

  • N.A. Obeng-Darko
  • More
  • Contribute

Stay connected

Sign up for our email alerts.

  • Issues
  • Advance publication
  • News
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Join the debate

Want to join OGELFORUM, our unique platform for oil, gas and energy issues?

Simply fill in the registration form to start your trial membership.

Download the app

  1. App store
  2. Google play

The Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL, ISSN 1875-418X) Journal and OGELFORUM listserv focus on recent developments in the area of oil, gas, energy law, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting, including the oil, gas, energy geopolitics. Read our Terms & Conditions here, and our Privacy Policy here.

About OGEL

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help

Other publications

  • Transnational Dispute Management (TDM)

© 2004 - 2021. Published by MARIS.

  • Home
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help