• Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Skip navigation

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Global Energy Law & Regulation Portal

Join OGELFORUM

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Global Energy Law & Regulation Portal

  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • Sign in
  • About About
    1. Home
    2. About
    3. About OGEL
    4. About OGEL
    5. Founding Editor T.W. Wälde
    6. T.W. Wälde
    7. Editorial team
    8. Editorial team
    9. Contributing Authors
    10. Contributing Authors
    11. Subscriptions
    12. Subscriptions
  • Journal Journal
    1. Home
    2. Journal
    3. Browse Issues
    4. Browse
    5. Articles by Category
    6. By Category
    7. Articles by Author
    8. By Author
    9. Advance publication
    10. Advance publication
    11. Specials
    12. Specials
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Book reviews
    16. Reviews
  • Legal & Regulatory docs. L & R docs
    1. Home
    2. Legal & Regulatory docs.
    3. L&R by Country
    4. L&R by Country
    5. L&R by Category
    6. L&R by Category
    7. L&R recent additions
    8. L&R recent additions
    9. Search
    10. Search
  • OGELFORUM OGELFORUM
    1. Home
    2. OGELFORUM
    3. About OGELFORUM
    4. About OGELFORUM
    5. Browse archive
    6. Browse by date / topic
    7. Search
    8. Search
    9. Join
    10. Join
  • News & Events Events
    1. Home
    2. News & Events
    3. News
    4. News
    5. Events
    6. Events
  • OGEL Studies OGEL Studies
    1. Home
    2. OGEL Studies
    3. About OGEL Studies
    4. About OGEL Studies
  • Subscribe
Home > Legal & Regulatory docs.

Vattenfall AB and others v. Federal Republic of Germany ICSID Case No. ARB/12/12 - Recommendation on the Second Proposal to Disqualify the Tribunal - 6 July 2020

  • Sign in to download document
Country
  • Germany
  • Sweden
Year

2020

Summary

Reproduced from www.worldbank.org/icsid with permission of ICSID.

I. Introduction

1. The present recommendation (the "Recommendation") concerns the arbitration proceedings commenced in 2012 by 1. Vattenfall AB; 2. Vattenfall GmbH; 3. Vattenfall Europe Nuclear Energy GmbH; 4. Kernkraftwerk Krümmel GmbH & Co. oHG; 5. Kernkraftwerk Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. oHG (the "Claimants"), against the Federal Republic of Germany (the "Respondent", and together with the Claimants, the "Parties") under the Energy Charter Treaty of December 17, 1994 (the "Treaty" or the "ECT"). Vattenfall AB is a Swedish company; the remaining claimants are subsidiaries of Vattenfall AB incorporated in Germany.

2. These arbitration proceedings are administered by the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID") pursuant to the Convention on the Settlement of Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (the "ICSID Convention") and the Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (the "ICSID Arbitration Rules").

3. By letter dated 8 May 2020 from Ms. Jara Mínguez Almeida, Legal Counsel at ICSID, I have been asked to provide a recommendation to ICSID on the Respondent's Application for the Disqualification of the Tribunal (the "Proposal"), submitted on 16 April 2020.

4. The Respondent's Proposal is based on allegations that:

(a) Judge Brower, as a member of the Tribunal, failed to disclose an issue conflict stemming from his 10 October 2014 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion in The PV Investors v. The Kingdom of Spain ("Judge Brower's Opinion"), concerning Article 26(7) of the Treaty ("Ground One");

(b) The Tribunal engaged in "illicit deliberations" by considering the Preliminary Award on Jurisdiction in The PV Investors v. The Kingdom of Spain and Judge Brower's Opinion, which were unknown to the Parties ("Ground Two").

(c) The Tribunal decided to hold a hearing on certain quantum matters by videoconference over the objections of the Respondent, which considers an in person hearing to be necessary ("Ground Three").

(d) The Tribunal maintained an "impossible procedural calendar" and refused the Respondent's requests for extensions in light of the challenges posed by the present public health situation of the coronavirus pandemic ("Ground Four").

5. Additionally, the Respondent considers that Judge Brower's comments on the Proposal constitute a further ground for disqualification, insofar as he "left the role of an arbitrator, `descended into the fray' and abandoned all the distance required for independent judgment"1 ("Ground Five").

...

V. Conclusion

156. It follows from the legal principles set out above that a party proposing the disqualification of an arbitrator must prove the existence of objective facts from which a reasonable third person may infer a manifest lack of the arbitrator's impartiality or independence. Subjective inferences or beliefs are insufficient.

157. As set out above, I do not consider that the record before me can reasonably be considered to support an inference that either Judge Brower or the Tribunal as a whole manifestly cannot be "relied upon to exercise independent judgment." Therefore, I conclude that the Respondent has not discharged its burden of proving that Judge Brower (with respect to Grounds One and Five), or any of the three members of the Arbitral Tribunal (with respect to Grounds Two to Four), manifestly lacks any of the qualities required under Article 14(1) of the ICSID Convention in relation to the four grounds on which the Proposal is based, or the fifth ground arising from Judge Brower's response to the Proposal itself.

VI. Recommendation

158. For the foregoing reasons, I recommend that the proposal to disqualify the Tribunal be rejected.

Hugo Hans Siblesz, Secretary-General
Permanent Court of Arbitration
The Hague, 6 July 2020

To download this document you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!

If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here

Call for contributions

OGEL Call for Papers: COVID-19 and the Energy Transition

Dr. Theophilus Acheampong and Professor Tina Soliman Hunter

  • Dr. Theophilus Acheampong
  • Prof. Tina Hunter

OGEL Call for Papers: Law and Policy for Gas Flaring in a Low-carbon Economy

Dr. Tade Oyewunmi and Mohamed Rali Badissy

  • Dr. Tade Oyewunmi
  • Mohamed Rali Badissy

OGEL Call for Papers: The Circular Economy and the Energy Transition

Dr. Maria R. Mazzanti and Giacomo Luciani

OGEL Call for Papers

OGEL Call for Papers: The Hydrogen Economy

Dr. C. Kelly, Dr. M. Wüstenberg, Dr. S.L. Penttinen, Prof. K. Talus

  • Dr. Cameron Kelly
  • Dr. Moritz Wüstenberg
  • Dr. Sirja-Leena Penttinen
  • Prof. Kim Talus

OGEL Call for Papers: Review of the Energy Sector in Ghana

Victoria Ayensu

  • Victoria Ayensu

OGEL Call for Papers: Special Issue on Energy Transitions 2020

Nana Asare Obeng-Darko

  • Nana Asare Obeng-Darko
  • More
  • Contribute

Advance publication

Good Oil, Clean Waters? Ghana's Oil Decade and Environmental Protection

16 Dec 2020

A.B. Opoku Acquah

  • A.B. Opoku Acquah

The Hydrogen Hope? Challenges and Opportunities for an Australian Hydrogen Industry

15 Dec 2020

M. Taylor, T. Soliman Hunter

  • M. Taylor
  • T. Soliman Hunter

Taxonomy Regulation, Principle of Technological Neutrality and Delegated Acts - Does the Draft Screening Regulation Comply with EU Law Requirements?

14 Dec 2020

K. Talus

  • K. Talus
  • More
  • Contribute

Stay connected

Sign up for our email alerts.

  • Issues
  • Advance publication
  • News
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Join the debate

Want to join OGELFORUM, our unique platform for oil, gas and energy issues?

Simply fill in the registration form to start your trial membership.

Download the app

  1. App store
  2. Google play

The Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL, ISSN 1875-418X) Journal and OGELFORUM listserv focus on recent developments in the area of oil, gas, energy law, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting, including the oil, gas, energy geopolitics. Read our Terms & Conditions here, and our Privacy Policy here.

About OGEL

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help

Other publications

  • Transnational Dispute Management (TDM)

© 2004 - 2021. Published by MARIS.

  • Home
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help