• Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Skip navigation

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Global Energy Law & Regulation Portal

Join OGELFORUM

Oil, Gas & Energy Law

Global Energy Law & Regulation Portal

  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • Sign in
  • About About
    1. Home
    2. About
    3. About OGEL
    4. About OGEL
    5. Founding Editor T.W. Wälde
    6. T.W. Wälde
    7. Editorial team
    8. Editorial team
    9. Contributing Authors
    10. Contributing Authors
    11. Subscriptions
    12. Subscriptions
  • Journal Journal
    1. Home
    2. Journal
    3. Browse Issues
    4. Browse
    5. Articles by Category
    6. By Category
    7. Articles by Author
    8. By Author
    9. Advance publication
    10. Advance publication
    11. Specials
    12. Specials
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Book reviews
    16. Reviews
  • Legal & Regulatory docs. L & R docs
    1. Home
    2. Legal & Regulatory docs.
    3. L&R by Country
    4. L&R by Country
    5. L&R by Category
    6. L&R by Category
    7. L&R recent additions
    8. L&R recent additions
    9. Search
    10. Search
  • OGELFORUM OGELFORUM
    1. Home
    2. OGELFORUM
    3. About OGELFORUM
    4. About OGELFORUM
    5. Browse archive
    6. Browse by date / topic
    7. Search
    8. Search
    9. Join
    10. Join
  • News & Events Events
    1. Home
    2. News & Events
    3. News
    4. News
    5. Events
    6. Events
  • OGEL Studies OGEL Studies
    1. Home
    2. OGEL Studies
    3. About OGEL Studies
    4. About OGEL Studies
  • Subscribe
Home > Legal & Regulatory docs.

Al-Qarqani v Chevron Corporation - United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit No 19-17074 - Opinion - 12 August 2021

  • Sign in to download document
Country
  • Saudi Arabia
  • United States
Year

2021

Summary

Arbitration

Affirming the district court's judgment on a petition for enforcement of a foreign arbitral award against Chevon Corporation, the panel held that the parties did not enter into a binding agreement to arbitrate, and enforcement under the New York Convention therefore should be denied.

In 1949, the government of Saudi Arabia transferred land to an official, who leased it to an affiliate of what later became Chevron. The official's heirs claimed that Chevron owed them rent. They contended that an arbitration clause contained in a separate 1933 land concession agreement between Saudi Arabia and Chevron's predecessor, Standard Oil Company of California, applied to their dispute. An Egyptian arbitral panel agreed and awarded them $18 billion. The district court found that the parties had never agreed to arbitrate and therefore held that it lacked jurisdiction over the heirs' petition for enforcement of the award.

The panel held that under Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(A), the five heirs named in the notice of appeal were the only proper appellants.

Agreeing with the Second Circuit, and disagreeing with the Eleventh Circuit, the panel held that the absence of an agreement to arbitrate was a reason to deny enforcement on the merits, rather than to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The panel held that so long as a party makes a non-frivolous claim that an arbitral award is covered by the New York Convention, the district court must assume subject-matter jurisdiction.

The panel held that as to respondent Chevron USA, Inc., which was not named in the Egyptian arbitral award, the heirs advanced no non-frivolous theory of enforcement. The panel therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction as to Chevron USA.

The panel held that as to Chevron Corporation, the district court correctly concluded that there was no binding agreement to arbitrate between the parties. First, the heirs could not enforce the 1933 concession agreement against Chevron directly because the agreement was signed by Saudi Arabia, not the heirs, and Chevron's rights and obligations under the 1933 agreement were extinguished long ago.

Second, the 1949 deed did not incorporate by reference the arbitration clause contained in the 1933 agreement. The panel held that the proper disposition was not dismissal but denial of the enforcement petition on the merits.

Nonetheless, because there was no reason to remand to the district court simply to direct it to affix a new label to its order, the panel affirmed the district court's judgment.

See also:

  • OGEL: First Petroleum Agreement between Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Standard Oil of California Company - English and Arabic - 20 May 1933
  • OGEL: Waleed Bin Khalid Abu Al-Waleed Al-Qargani v Chevron - Arbitration Award Issued by the International Arbitration Center Cairo - English and Arabic - 3 June 2015
  • TDM: First Petroleum Agreement between Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Standard Oil of California Company - English and Arabic - 20 May 1933
  • TDM: Waleed Bin Khalid Abu Al-Waleed Al-Qargani v Chevron - Arbitration Award Issued by the International Arbitration Center Cairo - English and Arabic - 3 June 2015

To download this document you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!

If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here

Call for contributions

OGEL Call for Papers: International Energy and Investment Law Implications of the US Inflation Reduction Act

Tade Oyewunmi, Frédéric Sourgens, Scot W. Anderson, and Almira Moronne

  • Tade Oyewunmi
  • Frédéric Sourgens
  • Scot Anderson
  • Almira Moronne

OGEL Call for Papers: Climate Litigation and the Energy Sector

Prof. Kim Talus

  • Kim Talus

OGEL Call for Papers: The Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Energy Sector

Agnieszka Ason, Konstantin Christie, Prof. Kim Talus

  • Agnieszka Ason
  • Konstantin Christie
  • Kim Talus

Call for Papers: OGEL Energy Law Journal 2023

Call for Papers: OGEL Energy Law Journal 2023

OGEL Editorial Team

  • More
  • Contribute

Advance publication

Now available in OGEL 3 (2023): Sustainable Pathways to Balancing Decarbonization in the Face of Fossil Energy Dependence, Nigeria as a Case Study

1 Sep 2023

M.P. Ezekiel, F. Dimowo

  • M.P. Ezekiel
  • F. Dimowo

Individuals and NGOs vs Corporations in the Pursuit of Climate Accountability. In the Spotlight: The Italian Oil Major ENI

1 Sep 2023

S. Nedeva

  • S. Nedeva

Advancing the Net Zero Transition: A Critical Review of the Laws on Decarbonisation of the Nigerian Gas Sector

15 Aug 2023

U.V. Obi SAN

  • U.V. Obi  SAN
  • More
  • Contribute

Stay connected

Sign up for our email alerts.

  • Issues
  • Advance publication
  • News
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Join the debate

Want to join OGELFORUM, our unique platform for oil, gas and energy issues?

Simply fill in the registration form to start your trial membership.

Download the app

  1. App store
  2. Google play

The Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL, ISSN 1875-418X) Journal and OGELFORUM listserv focus on recent developments in the area of oil, gas, energy law, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting, including the oil, gas, energy geopolitics. Read our Terms & Conditions here, and our Privacy Policy here.

About OGEL

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help

Other publications

  • Transnational Dispute Management (TDM)

© 2004 - 2023. Published by MARIS.

  • Home
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help