Summary

... The Respondents rely on (a) s 24(b) of the International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) (the "IAA") and Art 34(2)(a)(ii) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the "Model Law") in contending that there was a breach of natural justice in connection with the making of the impugned part of the Award ("Ground 1"); 1 and (b) Art 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Model Law in contending that the impugned part of the Award contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration ...